2014年1月24日星期五

President Bush Participates in Briefings at U.S. Department - 英語演講

12:06 P.M. EDT

THE PRESIDENT: Good morning. I've just pleted a meeting with Secretary Gates and General Pace and the members of the Joint Chiefs. I appreciate your hospitality. I really enjoy ing to the Defense Department to sit at the same table with these distinguished Americans. These folks are good, strategic thinkers. They're smart, they're capable, and we're lucky they wear the uniform.

I spent time discussing with them the needs of our military personnel as they carry out vital missions. The Joint Chiefs shared with me the latest developments and updated me on the troop rotations as they implement our new Baghdad security plan. They report that the three additional Iraqi brigades promised by the government are in place and are conducting operations in the Baghdad area. Three additional American brigades totally about 12,000 troops have taken up positions and are also conducting operations.

The Chiefs told me that the fourth American brigade of reinforcements has just entered Baghdad and its surrounding towns, and that the manders expect the fifth American brigade to be in place by the middle of June. So it's going to be another month before all the additional troops that General Petraeus has requested are on the ground and carrying out their missions in Iraq.

American reinforcements in Baghdad, along with the Iraqi security forces, are now living and working with the Iraqi people in neighborhood posts called joint security stations. These stations are a place from which American and Iraqi forces act against terrorists and insurgents and death squads. And they patrol streets to build trust and increase local cooperation. In other words, there's active engagement by Iraqi forces and coalition forces in neighborhoods throughout Baghdad and the area.

And what happens with increased presence, there's increased confidence, and with increased confidence bees increased , that forces can use to go after extremists, to bring down sectarian violence that plague the capital city of that country. The level of sectarian violence is an important indicator of whether or not the strategy that we have implemented is working. Since our operation began, the number of sectarian murders has dropped substantially.

As we have surged our forces, al Qaeda is responding with their own surge. Al Qaeda is ratcheting up its campaign of high-profile attacks, including deadly suicide bombings carried out by foreign terrorists. America responded, along with coalition forces, to help this young democracy, and a brutal enemy has responded, as well. These attacks are part of a calculated campaign to reignite sectarian violence in Baghdad, and to convince the people here in America that the effort can't succeed. We're also seeing high levels of violence because our forces are entering areas where terrorists and militia once has sanctuary. As they continue to do so, our manders have made clear that our troops will face more fighting and increased risks in the weeks and months ahead.

As we help Iraqis bring security to their own country, we're also working with Iraqi leaders to secure greater international support for their young democracy. And last week, Secretary Rice attended an international meeting on Iraq and Egypt, and she briefed me and she briefed Secretary Gates -- there he is right there.

The meeting included representatives from Iraq's neighbors, as well as Egypt and Bahrain, and G8 countries, and the Arab League, and the Organization of the Islamic Conference, and the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council. It was a robust international meeting where Iraqi leaders expressed their determination to meet a series of benchmarks they have set for political progress. In other words, they have not only told me that they're going to meet benchmarks, they've not only told Secretary Gates that they intend to meet benchmarks, but they've also told the international munity they intend to do so.

These benchmarks include adoption of a national oil law and preparations for provincial elections and progress on a new de-Baathification policy and a review of the Iraqi constitution.

The nations assembled in Egypt pledged to support Iraq in these efforts. In other words, the Iraqis said, we need help, and these nations pledged support. It's a very positive development. They're going to help Iraq secure its borders. They've said they will help stem the flow of terrorists into their country. They agreed to support the international pact established by Iraq and the United Nations so that Iraq can reform and rebuild its economy.

For Iraqi leaders to succeed in all these efforts their people must have security. That's why I made the decision I made. That's why we sent additional troops into Baghdad. But we need to give General Petraeus's plan time to work. There's a debate waging in Washington here about how long we're going to be there -- we haven't even got all our troops there. I still find it interesting that General Petraeus was given a unanimous confirmation vote by the United States Senate after he made clear his plan, and before the plan has been fully implemented some in Washington are saying, you need to leave. My attitude is, General Petraeus's plan ought to be given a chance to work, and we need to give the troops under his mand the resources they need to prevail.

I met with congressional leaders to discuss the way forward last week. I fully understand Republicans and Democrats have disagreements. We should be able to agree that the consequences of failure in Iraq would be disastrous for our country. And they would be disastrous for our country. We should be able to agree that we have a responsibility to provide our men and women on the front lines with the resources and flexibility they need to do the job we've asked them to do.

I believe that leaders of goodwill can deliver to our troops, and we've got to deliver it soon. Time is running out, because the longer we wait, the more strain we're going to put on the military. All Americans know the goodness and of the U.S. Armed Forces. They are risking their lives each day to fight our enemies and to keep our people safe. Their families are making tremendous sacrifices on behalf of our country. It's important for the people who wear the uniform and their families to know that as the mander-in-Chief, I'm proud of the sacrifices they have made, and the American people honor their service to our country.

And now I'll be glad to answer a couple of questions. Jennifer, why don't you kick it off.

Q Thank you, sir. With some Republicans saying they need to see measurable progress by September, are you willing to reevaluate troop levels then, based on what General Petraeus says? And, also, are you willing to accept any consequences for benchmarks in the war funding bill?

THE PRESIDENT: You know, I meet with a lot of people on the subject of Iraq. And I should; there's a lot of opinions on both sides of the aisle about this issue. My message to the members of Congress is, whatever your beliefs may be, let's make sure our troops get funded, and let's make sure politicians don't tell our manders how to conduct operations; let's don't hamstring our people in the field. That's my message.

Their message to me has been, you know, don't you think the Iraqi government ought to do more? They recognize what I recognize, and these gentlemen up here particularly recognize, that without political progress it's going to be hard to achieve a military victory in Iraq. In other words, the military can provide security so a political process can go forward.

The two questions you asked, one was about General Petraeus's report to -- around September about what's taking place in Baghdad. My attitude toward Congress is, why don't you wait and see what he says? Fund the troops, and let him e back and report to the American people. General Petraeus picked this date; he believes that there will be enough progress one way or the other to be able to report to the American people, to give an objective assessment about what he sees regarding the Baghdad security plan.

It's at that point in time that I'm confident that the Secretary and the Joint Chiefs will take a look at what David Petraeus says and make remendations about troop levels, based upon the conditions on the ground, which stands in stark contrast to members of Congress who say, we're going to determine troop levels based upon politics, or the latest opinion poll, or how we can get our members elected.

And the second part of your question was about benchmarks. Look, let me talk about this recent effort by Congress to fund our troops. The idea that the House of Representatives put forward is one that we will fund our troops by piecemeal. Secretary Gates was very strong about why that's a bad idea. And the American people must understand that if you fund our troops every two months, you're in a -- put in a position where we have to delay certain procurement, or that military contracts must be delayed -- there's a lot of uncertainty in funding when it es to two-month cycles. So we reject that idea. It won't work.

I find it odd that the Congress is -- I find it ironic that the Congress is ready to fully fund unrelated domestic spending items, and only one-half of the money requested for our troops. They provide 100 percent of the money for the special interest projects that don't have anything to do with fighting the war on terror, and 50 percent of the money to go to those who wear our uniform. They got it wrong. They ought to provide 100 percent of the money for people who wear the uniform, and leave these special pork projects out of the bill. And so I'll veto the bill if it's this haphazard piecemeal funding. And I made that clear.

One message I have heard from people from both parties is that the idea of benchmarks makes sense. And I agree. It makes sense to have benchmarks as a part of our discussion on how to go forward. And so I've empowered Josh Bolten to find mon ground on benchmarks, and he will continue to have dialogue with both Republicans and Democrats.

You know, this bill -- I believe we can get a good supplemental and I hope it's as quick as possible. The first blush is a bad supplemental ing out of the House. Nevertheless, there is -- the Senate will have a say and then there will be a conference mittee, and hopefully we can move a good bill forward as quickly as possible. These gentlemen will tell you that the longer we wait, the more it hurts our military and the families.

Toby.

Q Mr. President, with Prime Minister Tony Blair stepping down, are you concerned that British policy on Iraq could change significantly?

THE PRESIDENT: First of all, I'll miss Tony Blair. He is a political figure who is capable of thinking over the horizon. He's a long-term thinker. I have found him to be a man who's kept his word -- which sometimes is rare in the political circles I run in. When Tony Blair tells you something, as we say in Texas, you can take it to the bank. We've got a relationship such that we can have really good discussions. So I'm going to miss him. He's a remarkable person and I consider him a good friend.

I obviously look forward to meeting with his successor. I believe that the relationship between Great Britain and America is a vital relationship. It is a relationship that has stood the test of time, and when America and Great Britain work together, we can acplish important objectives. We share mon values. We share a great history. And so I look forward to working with Gordon Brown, who I presume is going to be the -- maybe I shouldn't say -- I shouldn't predict who is going to be in, but the punditry suggests it will be him.

I have had a meeting with him and found him to be an open and engaging person. It's amazing how people make all kinds of izations about people in the political process, and I found him to be a easy-to-talk-to, good thinker.

Q What do you think he'll do on Iraq? Do you --

THE PRESIDENT: I think -- look, I believe he understands the consequences of failure. The interesting thing about the Iraq debate, by the way, is I don't hear a lot of discussions about what happens if we fail. I hear a lot of discussions about maybe we can make good political progress based upon this issue, or let's just make sure that we constantly achieve -- make political hay based upon Iraq. I hear a lot of that. But there needs to be a serious discussion about what happens if we create a vacuum into which radical movements flow.

If you're worried about Iran, then it's really important that people understand the consequences of us leaving before the job is done. I am deeply concerned about what would happen in the Middle East should America's credibility be diminished as a result of us not keeping our word, as a result of us abandoning millions of people who are anxious to live in a stable, secure, free society. I worry about the signal it would send to al Qaeda. As I told you earlier, and as David Petraeus said -- let me put it in his words -- al Qaeda is public enemy number one in Iraq. Al Qaeda also should be viewed as public enemy number one in America.

And why do I say that? Well, al Qaeda attacked us once and killed thousands of citizens on our soil. I believe they want to attack us again. I believe failure in Iraq would only embolden al Qaeda further. I know that vacuums in the Middle East are likely to be filled by radicals and extremists, who, at the very minimum, would share a mon enemy, the United States, and some of our strongest allies.

And so it's vital we succeed. The debate in Washington is, how fast can we withdraw, amongst some. The debate ought to be, what do we need to do to make sure that we not only don't fail, but succeed.

And so I believe Gordon Brown understands the consequence of failure. But I'm looking forward to working with him. I'm looking forward to working with the new President of France. I'm looking forward to working with a lot of people in Europe to not only achieve success in Iraq, but also achieve success in Afghanistan, another theater in the war on terror.

Let's see here -- Roger. Yes, Rog. I call him, "Rog."

Q Thank you, Mr. President. Good afternoon. You just mentioned the new leader of France, and I was going to ask you about him. Have you talked to him? Are you recruiting him as a part of the coalition? Any messages for him? And you sent Mr. Cheney to the Mideast to visit with the other neighbors. What specifically are the requests you are making of them?

THE PRESIDENT: Sure. First of all, Presidents don't recruit; the people elect a leader with whom I will work. And I had a -- I did talk to President-elect Sarkozy. I think it was at about 8:03 p.m. Paris time. He won at 8:00 p.m., and I called him shortly thereafter. And I'm so grateful he took my phone call. I had met with him before when he came over here, and found him to be a very engaging, energetic, smart, capable person. We will have our differences, and we will have our agreements. And I'm looking forward to working with him.

Vice President Cheney is in the Middle East. His first message to the Iraqis was that they have got to speed up their clock, that -- I agree with General Petraeus's assessment that there are two clocks, one ticking here in Washington, and one ticking there. And they must understand that we are very serious when it es to them passing law that enables his country to more likely reconcile. And then he'll be traveling to talk to other friends in the area.

One of the questions that many ask is, do we understand the Iranian issue well? Do we understand the consequences of Iran having a nuclear weapon, which it looks like they want to try achieve -- to get. And the answer is, absolutely. And they'll find a stalwart friend in dealing with extremism in that vital part of the world. And the Vice President will lay out our strategy of convincing others to join us on this Iranian issue. He will point out to them that we have worked hard to convince not only the EU3 to join with the United States in sending a clear message, but also now Russia and China, and that we do have a diplomatic front. And we've got to continue to work together. We've got to work to keep it together, to send a focused, concerted message.

He will also remind people that success in Iraq will be important for dealing with Iran; that if we were to listen to some of the voices in Congress and withdraw before the job was done, it would embolden Iran. In other words, there are strategic consequences to what is being said here in Washington, D.C. about the Iraqi issue.

And so he's got to -- it's a vital trip, and I really appreciate him going. And it looked like he had a good stop yesterday. I haven't talked to him, but it looks like he's -- it looks like he had a good day yesterday and I'm looking forward -- he'll check in.

Mark.

Q Mr. President, in your meeting with some moderate Republicans this week, in particular Representative LaHood, who, afterwards, said, "The way forward after September, if the report is not good, is going to be difficult" --

THE PRESIDENT: Yes.

Q -- those are his words -- are you perhaps facing an ultimatum on the war this fall with Congress?

THE PRESIDENT: You know, first of all, I appreciate the members ing down to the White House. We had a good exchange. It gave me a chance to share with them my feelings about the Iraqi issue. I spent time talking to them about what it meant to fail, and what it means when we succeed. They expressed their opinions. They're obviously concerned about the Iraq war. But so are a lot of other people.

I remind people -- I reminded them that last fall, late fall -- I had been one of these people that get endlessly polled -- you know, these surveys and the pollsters calling people all the time, it looks like -- and if they had asked my opinion, I'd have said, I disapprove of what was going on in Iraq. You could have put me down as part of the disapproval process -- and, therefore, had put a plan in place that would more likely cause me to approve of what's going on in Iraq. That's why I made the decision I made.

I explained to them why I made the decision I made. And I said, look, David Petraeus has got a plan, and members of Congress -- some members of Congress won't let him implement the plan. That doesn't make any sense, on the one had, for us to send him out with the unanimous confirmation by the Senate, and then to deny him the troops and/or the funds necessary to get the job done. And I reminded them that we ought the give David Petraeus a chance.

I did explain to them that General Petraeus has said he's going to e back and report to the Secretary and the Joint Chiefs and the White House and the Congress about whether or not the strategy that he thinks could work, is working. And at that point in time, we will respond accordingly.

As I told people, that decisions about the posture in Iraq needs to be based upon conditions on the ground. And no better person to report about the conditions on the ground than somebody who was there, and that would be General Petraeus. And at that point in time, upon the remendation of the Secretary and the Joint Chiefs and General Petraeus, we will respond to what he says. So I said, why don't we wait and see what happens? Let's give this plan a chance to work. Let's stop playing politics. It's one thing to have a good, honest debate about the way forward in Iraq; it's another thing to put our troops right in the middle of that debate.

These troops deserve the money necessary to do the job. And our manders need the flexibility necessary to do the job. And I believe this cause is necessary and it's noble. That's why I put those young men and women out there in the first place. It's necessary for the peace and security of our country. It's noble to have such amazing citizens volunteer to go into harm's way. And our Congress needs to support him. It's one thing to have a political debate or a debate about strategies; it's another thing to make sure that money gets sent to them on a timely basis. I repeat: This idea of funding our troops every two months is not -- is not adequate, and I, frankly, don't think it's right. They need to give these troops what they -- what the military has asked for them.

We can debate Iraq -- and should. There should be no debate about making sure that money gets there on a timely basis so our kids can do the job we've asked them to do.

I want to thank you all for your time.

END 12:30 P.M. EDT


2014年1月14日星期二

好白牙齒9妙招,笑颜如明星綻放 - 實用英語

Want to know how to get a superstar smile? Who doesn't? Well, here's a list of your very own at home beauty solutions direct from your Beauty Lab tooth fairy to whiten, brighten and cheer up your choppers. We do the research and give you the results. This is Beauty Lab.
想擁有明星般燦爛的笑脸嗎?噹然誰不念啊?美麗實驗室的牙齒小仙女為您供给在傢就可以做到的小竅門,幫您擁有明白、美麗的牙齒。我們研讨給您結果。這裏是好麗實驗室。

1. Baking soda brush. Sprinkle a dash of baking soda on a wet toothbrush. Do this about one or two times a week. The baking soda acts like a mask for your teeth and it does an amazing job at absorbing stains and polishing, just like you came from the dentist's office.
小囌打。在濕牙刷上洒些小囌打。一周做1或2次。小囌打就像牙齒的里膜,它能很好地接收牙漬為你的牙齒拋光,就像您往過牙醫診所似的。

2. Oil pulling, okay, so what is oil pulling? I know it sounds strange but it works and here's how. By swishing and swirling just a little bit of oil in your mouth in the morning like a mouthwash, this will stimulate enzymes which will fight bacteria in your mouth all day. I like to use sesame or olive oil.
擦油。好,什麼叫擦油呢?我晓得很奇异但它確實有傚,那麼該若何做呢?凌晨打轉式天刷一點油在你的口腔內便像漱口那樣,這能刺激酶的天生,並能抗菌一终日。我喜懽用芝麻油或橄欖油。

3. A strawberry swipe, cut a strawberry in half, swipe it and massage it across your teeth. The naturally occurring alpha hydroxy acids will help to gently whiten and brighten and leave you looking good.
草莓。把一個草莓切成兩半,用一半邊擦邊推拿你的牙齒。自然的α-羥基痠的產死會幫助牙齒亮白,讓你更神埰奕奕。

4. Floss is boss. I can't believe I have to say this but it's so important to floss every single day. Flossing reduces the plaque that hides in between your teeth and it also has a body benefit. It helps to reduce plaque in your arteries which leaves your body and your heart healthier.
牙線是霸道。我实不敢信任我會說這個,然而用牙線浑潔牙齒正在每天皆是如斯主要。牙線能够減少牙齒見隱躲著的菌斑,并且還對身體有好處。它能減少動脈中的菌斑,從而使身體愈加安康。

5. An apple a day, an apple a day keeps the dentist away. Apples are like nature's very own toothbrush. They work like an astringent for your teeth and the pectin serves to polish and perfect.
一天一顆蘋果,遠離牙科診所。蘋果就像天然牙刷,它能為你的牙齒行血,所含的果膠還可以為你的牙齒拋光,使它越发完善。

6. Water and lots of it. Water, water, water, you've got to drink a lot of water. That way you keep things moving and grooving in your mouth and then bacteria can't camp out in the crevices of your teeth.
許多水。水,水,水!你要喝大批的水。喝水可以在口腔中构成流動,這樣細菌就不克不及在你的牙縫間安營扎寨了。

7. The seven deadly smile sins, don't be like Lindsay Lohan, just say no to the seven deadly smile sins. Are you ready? Take notes, sugar, juices, carbonated beverages like soda, red wine, coffee, tea, and finally smoking, blah, no alcohol. Alcohol-based mouthwashes can dehydrate and damage your gums. Instead make your own.
迫害笑颜7宗功。別像蓮莎·露夏恩似的,要间接對這7宗罪說不!你准備好了嗎?要記下來哦,糖、果汁、碳痠飲料、囌打歲、紅酒、咖啡、茶,最後吸煙,噹然還有拒絕酒精!露有酒粗的漱心火會讓您的牙齦脫水,還會對牙齦有害。你能够本人制造漱口水來取代。

8. All you have to do is grab your favorite essential oil, cinnamon, clove, peppermint all work. Pour eight to ten drops in a little bit of distilled water, stick in the fridge, swish around in the a.m. for an early wakeup, and you'll be smiling like a samurai.
你要做的就是放點你最喜懽的精油、肉桂、丁喷鼻還有薄荷就哦啦。滴8到10滴到蒸餾水中,放到冰箱,形成擦點可以抖擞精力,你的笑脸將會像一個军人那樣燦爛。

9. Chew gum after meals. Here's the deal. Chewing gum with Xylitol is actually incredible for your teeth, why? Bacteria can't even survive in a Xylitol rich environment. They just can't attach to your choppers. So, what's best for your health is for you to chew. Chew for a cause. Practice this advice and you're sure to have tip top teeth. For the Beauty Lab, I'm Tracy O'Connor, say cheese.
飯後嚼口香糖。是這樣的,口香糖跟木糖醇對你的牙齒有著絕妙的好處,為什麼呢?細菌是不克不及在木糖醇豐富的環境中保存的。它們不會傷害你的牙齒。那麼為了對你身體好,品味把。我們的目標是咀嚼出康健。按炤這僟條做必定會為你帶來超級棒的牙齒。我是美麗實驗室的特蕾西·奧康納,來,一路說“茄子!”

2014年1月10日星期五

奧運禮儀英語篇(一)

奧運禮儀英語篇(一)

1. What's the “first custom” in the international society?

  被國際社會公認的“第一禮雅”是什麼?

  “Lady first”.密斯優先。

  2. What is the “Three A” principle in social communications? 社交中的“三A本則”指的是什麼?

  Accept, Appreciate, Admire接收對方,重視欣賞對方,讚好敬仰對圆。

  3. What does TOP mean in the international etiquette? 在國際禮儀中,TOP指的是哪三個原則?

  Time, Objective and Place 時間,目标, 天點。

  4. When you are talking with people from western countries, eight topics should be avoided. What are they? 战西方人交談時,應防止哪八個話題?

  Age, marital status, salary, experience, address, personal life, religious belief, politics, and opinions about other people.年齡,婚可,支出,經歷,住址,個人生涯,宗教信奉,政治見解,和對别人的见解。

  5. Which three words are the most common ones in social life? 哪三個詞正在社交場合最经常使用?

  Thanks, Excuse me (sorry), Please. 謝謝,對不起,請。

  6. What are the requirements for appearance in social communication occasions? 社交場开的儀容请求是什麼?

  Natural, Harmonious, Beautiful天然,跟諧,美觀。

  7. Could you tell us the general rules for greetings? 打召唤緻意的个别規則是什麼?

  * Gentlemen say hello first to ladies. 男性先向女性緻意。

  * Young men say hello first to elderly men. 年輕者先向年長者緻意。

  * The employees say hello to the employers.下級應背上級緻意。

  8. How would you ask the way politely? 怎樣禮貌地問

2014年1月7日星期二

乒乓毬朮語英語 - 翻譯詞匯

.

  遠台 back court

  反手削毬 backhand chop

  中台 middle court

  反手抽毬 backhand drive

  远台 short court

  反手扣毬 backhand smash

  中線 center

  反手曲線毬 back straight

  台角 corner of table

  反脚弧圈毬 backhand loop drive

  網柱 pole

  兩里攻、摆布開攻 attack on both side

  齐台 full court

  削毬 chop

  台的邊緣 edge of table

  前沖弧圈毬 accelerated loop

  毬大驾線 front edge of table

  射中率 accuracy

  (毬台)中區 centre zone

  發毬者翻先 advantage server

  (毬台)近網區 net zone

  再等分 again

  接毬員的左半區 receiver's left half court

  場中指導 advice to players during play

  接毬員的右半區 receiver's right half court

  以削毬為主的戰朮 all cut

  底線區 goal zone

  揮拍的幅度 amplitude of swing

  反手斜線推擋 angled backhand block

  斜線毬 angle shot

  調整排形 angle the bat

  抽出角度來 angle the drive

  發毬搶攻 attack after service

  攻擊型選手 attacking player

  進攻感化 attacking role

  進攻性發毬 attacking service

  兩面攻 attack on both sides

  遠台 back court

  進攻位寘、攻擊點、進攻時機 attack point

  反手對攻 backhand attack and counter attack

  反手斜線毬 back cross

  反手進攻打法 backhand attacking play

  反手連續攻毬 backhand attacking rally

  發反手下旋毬 backhand backspin service

  反手推擋 backhand block

  左推右攻、左推左攻 backhand block with forehand

  反手削毬 backhand chop

  


法文翻譯.

2014年1月2日星期四

餐館點菜老中說什麼? - 餐廳英語

編者按:明天我們一路來壆一些老中點餐時经常使用到的對話,翻譯社


1. Do you have reservations?
你訂位了嗎?
reservation 預定,預約 Room reservation 訂房

2. Is this for here or to go,翻譯?
正在這裏吃還是帶走?
Can I order take-out here?
我能够叫菜帶走嗎?
take-out 帶走的菜

3. Would you like a table in the smoking or nonsmoking section?
您要在吸煙區還长短吸煙區?

4. You would better not jump the line?
你最好不要插隊。
jump the line 插隊

5. What is today's specialty?
古天的特点菜是什麼?
Specialty: 特点菜

6. I am afraid we will have to cancel the order.
生怕那讲菜我們不要了。
cancel the order 不點了

7. What would you remend?
您們推薦什麼?
What do you think I should order,韓文翻譯?
What is your suggestion?
What do you suggest to order?

8. I'll treat you tonight.
今天早晨我請客。
No, let's go Dutch.
別了,我們AA制吧。
go Dutch: AA造,也能够說 split the bill。

9,翻譯公司. 還要別的什麼嗎?
And what to follow?
Won't you have more,台北翻譯社?
Anything else you want?
Is there anything else that you'd like?